[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1315338186.3400.20.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:43:06 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"jirislaby@...il.com" <jirislaby@...il.com>,
"sedat.dilek@...il.com" <sedat.dilek@...il.com>, alex.shi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v2] unix stream: Fix use-after-free crashes
Le mardi 06 septembre 2011 à 12:33 -0700, Tim Chen a écrit :
> Yes, I think locking the sendmsg for the entire duration of
> unix_stream_sendmsg makes a lot of sense. It simplifies the logic a lot
> more. I'll try to cook something up in the next couple of days.
Thats not really possible, we cant hold a spinlock and call
sock_alloc_send_skb() and/or memcpy_fromiovec(), wich might sleep.
You would need to prepare the full skb list, then :
- stick the ref on the last skb of the list.
Transfert the whole skb list in other->sk_receive_queue in one go,
instead of one after another.
Unfortunately, this would break streaming (big send(), and another
thread doing the receive)
Listen, I am wondering why hackbench even triggers SCM code. This is
really odd. We should not have a _single_ pid/cred ref/unref at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists