netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] per-cgroup tcp buffers control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:01:32 -0300
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<containers@...ts.osdl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<xemul@...allels.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/9] per-cgroup tcp buffers control

On 09/09/2011 12:12 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Sep 2011 01:23:16 -0300
> Glauber Costa<glommer@...allels.com>  wrote:
>
>> With all the infrastructure in place, this patch implements
>> per-cgroup control for tcp memory pressure handling.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@...allels.com>
>> CC: David S. Miller<davem@...emloft.net>
>> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>> CC: Eric W. Biederman<ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>
> Hmm, then, kmem_cgroup.c is just a caller of plugins implemented
> by other components ?

Kame,

Refer to my discussion with Greg. How would you feel about it being 
accounted to a single "kernel memory" limit in memcg?

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html