lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1315601283.91185.YahooMailNeo@web113908.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 9 Sep 2011 13:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Kumar S <ps2kumar@...oo.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Memory leak in ip_dst_cache

Hi Eric,
I did not flush those routes explicitly. They are flushed out automatically by calling "rt_run_flush". It inturn calls rt_free(), but __cache_free() never gets called after that. Basically, I have 512 MBytes of memory on board. I want to restrict the cache to around 64k, with max_size. But if I do that due to this leak, TCP/IP communication stops working when it reaches 64k.
 
Thanks
psk


----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Kumar S <ps2kumar@...oo.com>
Cc: 
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2011 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: Memory leak in ip_dst_cache

Le vendredi 09 septembre 2011 à 11:39 -0700, Kumar S a écrit :
> Hi Eric,
> Thanks for the response. Here is the output of the commands you mentioned.
> 

Hmm, you should have included netdev in this message.

> After injecting around11k routes:
> -sh-2.05b#
> -sh-2.05b# ip route ls cache | wc
>   23256  162772 1166903
> -sh-2.05b#
> 
> After route flush out:
> 
> -sh-2.05b#
> -sh-2.05b# ip route ls cache | wc
>      14      88     710
> -sh-2.05b#
> -sh-2.05b#
> -sh-2.05b#
> -sh-2.05b# cat /proc/slabinfo | grep ip_dst
> ip_dst_cache       11673  11685    256   15    1 : tunables  120   60    0 : slabdata    779    779      0

Thats OK : Each tcp session has a pointer to a dst.

When you "ip route flush cache", busy dst are all invalidated.
"ip route ls cache" doesnt output invalidated dsts.

As soon as tcp session will try to send a packet, it will notice the dst
is obsolete and 'free' it.


> -sh-2.05b#
> -sh-2.05b# grep . /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/*
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_burst:1250
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_cost:250
> grep: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/flush: Permission denied
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_elasticity:8
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_interval:60
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval:0
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval_ms:500
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_thresh:16384
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_timeout:300
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/max_delay:10
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/max_size:2097152
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_adv_mss:256
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_delay:2
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_pmtu:552
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/mtu_expires:600
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_load:5
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_number:9
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_silence:5120
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/secret_interval:600
> -sh-2.05b# rtstat -c10 -i1
> rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|rt_cache|
>  entries|  in_hit|in_slow_|in_slow_|in_no_ro|  in_brd|in_marti|in_marti| out_hit|out_slow|out_slow|gc_total|gc_ignor|gc_goal_|gc_dst_o|in_hlist|out_hlis|
>         |        |     tot|      mc|     ute|        |  an_dst|  an_src|        |    _tot|     _mc|        |      ed|    miss| verflow| _search|t_search|
>    11675|   27700|  101014|       0|       0|     130|       0|       0|   36284|   23436|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|    9658|   23140|
>    11675|       6|      18|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       2|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|
>    11675|       2|      10|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       2|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|
>    11675|       8|      18|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       2|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|
>    11675|       6|      18|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       2|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|
>    11675|       4|      16|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       4|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|
>    11675|       8|      12|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       2|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|
>    11675|       6|      10|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       2|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|
>    11675|       2|      14|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       2|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|
>    11675|       8|      12|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       2|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|       0|
> -sh-2.05b#
> 
> 

Thats pretty low ip route usage, you dont need to tweak your tunables.

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ