[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110912125250.GA3020447@jupiter.n2.diac24.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:52:50 +0200
From: David Lamparter <equinox@...c24.net>
To: John H <uothrawn@...oo.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Using gretap to tunnel layer 2 traffic
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 10:25:04AM -0700, John H wrote:
> [...] All VLANs and physical devices have MTUs of
> 1500. The gretap device has a resultant MTU of 1462, thereby causing the
> bridge device to have an MTU of 1462.
> [...]
> The real question is, however, why is any client able to send a single ICMP
> packet with size 1478 bytes when one of the hops along the way only
> supports 1462 bytes per its MTU? Shouldn't this have been negotiated
> beforehand?
No.
An Ethernet segment needs a single, unbroken, identical MTU at all of
its (packet-sending) participants. Your configuration is invalid; there
is no Ethernet-builtin mechanism to negotiate MTU.
You need to set all devices, hosts and possibly switches to the same MTU
value. (A switch with its default of 1500 isn't a problem as long as it
does not generate packets that large.) A way to do that is by DHCP,
which has a MTU option; that option is however not honoured by all
clients.
Alternatively, you need to change your gretap/bridge MTU to 1500, but
you'll somehow need to make gretap aware of the underlying
fragmentation support, from whereever it may come.
Alter-alternatively, you can use a layer 3 (IP/IPv6) router. IP, unlike
Ethernet, is designed to cope with varying MTUs...
-David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists