netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: change capability used by socket options IP{,V6}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1315927629.5851.4.camel@bzorp>
Date:	Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:27:09 +0200
From:	Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@...abit.hu>
To:	Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
Cc:	Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: change capability used by socket options
 IP{,V6}_TRANSPARENT

On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 12:10 -0700, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote:
> From: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
> 
> Up till now the IP{,V6}_TRANSPARENT socket options (which actually set
> the same bit in the socket struct) have required CAP_NET_ADMIN
> privileges to set or clear the option.
> 
> - we make clearing the bit not require any privileges.
> - we deprecate using CAP_NET_ADMIN for this purpose.
> - we introduce a new capability CAP_NET_TRANSPARENT,
>   which is tailored to allow setting just this bit.
> - we allow either one of CAP_NET_TRANSPARENT or CAP_NET_RAW
>   to set this bit, because raw sockets already effectively
>   allow you to emulate socket transparency, and make the
>   transition easier for apps not desiring to use a brand
>   new capability (because of header file or glibc support)
> - we print a warning (but allow it) if you try to set
>   the socket option with CAP_NET_ADMIN privs, but without
>   either one of CAP_NET_TRANSPARENT or CAP_NET_RAW.
> 
> The reason for introducing a new capability is that while
> transparent sockets are potentially dangerous (and can let you
> spoof your source IP on traffic), they don't normally give you
> the full 'freedom' of eavesdropping and/or spoofing that raw sockets
> give you.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@...gle.com>
> CC: Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@...abit.hu>

This is ok for me, as long as the security maintainers allow the
introduction of this new cap.

Thanks for doing this and sorry for the late reply.

Acked-by: Balazs Scheidler <bazsi@...abit.hu>

-- 
Bazsi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html