[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1316227829.27917.19.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:50:28 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 01/11] ixgb: convert to ndo_fix_features
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 19:15 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> Private rx_csum flags are now duplicate of netdev->features & NETIF_F_RXCSUM.
> Removing this needs deeper surgery.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgb/ixgb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgb/ixgb_main.c
[]
> @@ -439,12 +462,14 @@ ixgb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> if (err)
> goto err_sw_init;
>
> - netdev->features = NETIF_F_SG |
> - NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
> + netdev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG |
> + NETIF_F_TSO |
> + NETIF_F_HW_CSUM;
> + netdev->features = netdev->hw_features |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_FILTER;
> - netdev->features |= NETIF_F_TSO;
> + netdev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
Is there any real reason to do this?
It looks overly complicated for no benefit.
Why not just use something like:
netdev->hw_features = foo;
netdev->features = bar;
or maybe use #defines like:
#define FEATURES_DEFAULT (NETIF_F_NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM)
#define FEATURES_HW_VLAN (NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_TX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_FILTER)
and
netdev->features = FEATURES_DEFAULT | FEATURES_HW_VLAN;
netdev->hw_features = FEATURES_DEFAULT | NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists