netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] socket: initial cgroup code.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110917175207.GB1658@shutemov.name>
Date:	Sat, 17 Sep 2011 20:52:07 +0300
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...lmenage.org,
	lizf@...fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, davem@...emloft.net, gthelen@...gle.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] socket: initial cgroup code.

On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:46:10PM -0300, Glauber Costa wrote:
> We aim to control the amount of kernel memory pinned at any
> time by tcp sockets. To lay the foundations for this work,
> this patch adds a pointer to the kmem_cgroup to the socket
> structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> CC: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> CC: Hiroyouki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> CC: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/net/sock.h         |    2 ++
>  net/core/sock.c            |    3 +++
>  3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 3b535db..be457ce 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -395,5 +395,43 @@ mem_cgroup_print_bad_page(struct page *page)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INET
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR_KMEM
> +#include <net/sock.h>
> +static inline void sock_update_memcg(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> +	/* right now a socket spends its whole life in the same cgroup */
> +	BUG_ON(sk->sk_cgrp);
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	sk->sk_cgrp = mem_cgroup_from_task(current);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We don't need to protect against anything task-related, because
> +	 * we are basically stuck with the sock pointer that won't change,
> +	 * even if the task that originated the socket changes cgroups.
> +	 *
> +	 * What we do have to guarantee, is that the chain leading us to
> +	 * the top level won't change under our noses. Incrementing the
> +	 * reference count via cgroup_exclude_rmdir guarantees that.
> +	 */
> +	cgroup_exclude_rmdir(mem_cgroup_css(sk->sk_cgrp));
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +}
> +
> +static inline void sock_release_memcg(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> +	cgroup_release_and_wakeup_rmdir(mem_cgroup_css(sk->sk_cgrp));
> +}

Do we really need to have these functions in the header?

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html