[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E76288A.4020801@xenotime.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 10:21:14 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
gregkh@...e.de, joe@...ches.com, jim.cromie@...il.com,
bvanassche@....org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ] dynamic_debug: call __netdev_printk only for CONFIG_NET
On 09/18/2011 01:27 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:18:18AM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> __netdev_printk is only defined when CONFIG_NET is set. Since we only need
>>> __dynamic_netdev_dbg for network drivers, we can make it conditional on the
>>> same Kconfig symbol.
>>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, I've posted a fix for this:
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/30/297
>>
>> Hopefully, it will be pulled in soon.
>
> As that thread again spun off into confusion, can you please resend the
> end result?
That spinning confusion had nothing to do with the posted & correct patch
which could have been applied several weeks ago.
I'm curious: Do you delete most of your email on a routine basis?
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists