netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix validation of D-SACK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E777BEC.7050600@computer.org>
Date:	Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:29:16 +0200
From:	Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@...puter.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	zheng.z.yan@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: fix validation of D-SACK

On 09/19/2011 04:37 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> D-SACK is allowed to reside below snd_una. But the corresponding check
>> in tcp_is_sackblock_valid() is the exact opposite. It looks like a typo.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yan<zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
>> Acked-by: Eric Dumazet<eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Applied, thanks.

Dave,

Have you also queued it up for stable as per Eric's remark that this was 
introduced in 2.6.24?

Sorry if this is implied in your workflow.

Thanks, Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html