[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110920081438.GB28389@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:14:39 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
To: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
CC: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] net/fec: set phy_speed to the optimal frequency 2.5
MHz
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 09:50:17AM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Shawn Guo writes:
> > With the unnecessary 1 bit left-shift on fep->phy_speed during the
> > calculation, the phy_speed always runs at the half frequency of the
> > optimal one 2.5 MHz.
> >
> > The patch removes that 1 bit left-shift to get the optimal phy_speed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/fec.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/fec.c b/drivers/net/fec.c
> > index 5ef0e34..04206e4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/fec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/fec.c
> > @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static int fec_enet_mii_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > /*
> > * Set MII speed to 2.5 MHz (= clk_get_rate() / 2 * phy_speed)
> > */
> > - fep->phy_speed = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(fep->clk), 5000000) << 1;
> > + fep->phy_speed = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(fep->clk), 5000000);
> > writel(fep->phy_speed, fep->hwp + FEC_MII_SPEED);
> >
> > fep->mii_bus = mdiobus_alloc();
> >
> The left shift accounts for the fact, that the MII_SPEED bitfield
> starts at pos 1 in the register. Thus the divider value has to be
> shifted left to occupy the correct bit positions in the register.
>
Oops, I missed that.
> According to my measurements on the TX28 the original code works
> correctly!
> Did you measure the actual frequency on the MDC pin after you change?
>
I should have done that before sending this patch. I'm working home
these days and have not got the chance get into the lab. Yes, I
should have sent this patch as an RFC at least. Sorry about this,
and thank you for pointing this out.
Will drop this patch from the v2 of the series.
--
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists