netdev - Re: TCP_DELACK_MIN vs TCP_ATO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEnQRZBdoPBn1bidga5c89n-Oru2JzrQa9bTj_tBG4HxS33PyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:28:19 +0300
From:	Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To:	rohan puri <rohan.puri15@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org>
Subject: Re: TCP_DELACK_MIN vs TCP_ATO_MIN

> Now the default value is of both the macros is same.
>
> But if you want to make delayed ack timeout configurable, then I think you
> should give proc interface for TCP_DELACK_MIN.

Thanks Rohan. Then also I have to export TCP_DELACK_MAX since I think
ato cannot grow over this value.

thanks,
Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html