netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHH2K0Yuji2_2pMdzEaMvRx0KE7OOaoEGT+OK4gJgTcOPKuT9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:01:46 -0700
From:	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...lmenage.org,
	lizf@...fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, kirill@...temov.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com> wrote:
> +static inline bool mem_cgroup_is_root(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
> +{
> +       return (mem == root_mem_cgroup);
> +}
> +

Why are you adding a copy of mem_cgroup_is_root().  I see one already
in v3.0.  Was it deleted in a previous patch?

> +static int tcp_write_maxmem(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft, u64 val)
> +{
> +       struct mem_cgroup *sg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
> +       struct mem_cgroup *parent = parent_mem_cgroup(sg);
> +       struct net *net = current->nsproxy->net_ns;
> +       int i;
> +
> +       if (!cgroup_lock_live_group(cgrp))
> +               return -ENODEV;

Why is cgroup_lock_live_cgroup() needed here?  Does it protect updates
to sg->tcp_prot_mem[*]?

> +static u64 tcp_read_maxmem(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft)
> +{
> +       struct mem_cgroup *sg = mem_cgroup_from_cont(cgrp);
> +       u64 ret;
> +
> +       if (!cgroup_lock_live_group(cgrp))
> +               return -ENODEV;

Why is cgroup_lock_live_cgroup() needed here?  Does it protect updates
to sg->tcp_max_memory?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html