[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110926.170049.1943390151354224651.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:00:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: benve@...co.com
Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
gregory.v.rose@...el.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next] iproute2: Add new command to IP link to
enable/disable VF spoof check
From: "Christian Benvenuti (benve)" <benve@...co.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:54:53 -0500
> Does it mean that a Netlink interface becomes official (and backward
> compatibility should not be broken) only once iproute2 starts
> supporting it?
It needs to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. Sometimes we can quickly
fix a poorly designed netlink interface is no major tool takes on use of
the feature.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists