netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio-net: Verify page list size before fitting into skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1317065842.20885.3.camel@lappy>
Date:	Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:37:22 +0300
From:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio-net: Verify page list size before fitting
 into skb

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 21:44 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 08:41:08PM +0300, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > This patch verifies that the length of a buffer stored in a linked list
> > of pages is small enough to fit into a skb.
> > 
> > If the size is larger than a max size of a skb, it means that we shouldn't
> > go ahead building skbs anyway since we won't be able to send the buffer as
> > the user requested.
> > 
> > Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> > Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> 
> Interesting.  This is a theoretical issue, correct?
> Not a crash you actually see.

Actually it was an actual crash caused when our virtio-net driver in kvm
tools did funny things and passed '(u32)-1' length as a buffer length to
the guest kernel.

> This crash would mean device is giving us packets
> that are way too large. Avoiding crashes even in the face of
> a misbehaved device is a good idea, but should
> we print a diagnostic to a system log?
> Maybe rate-limited or print once to avoid filling
> up the disk. Other places in driver print with pr_debug
> I'm not sure that's right but better than nothing.

Yup, I'll add some debug info.

> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c |    3 +++
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 0c7321c..64e0717 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -165,6 +165,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> >  	unsigned int copy, hdr_len, offset;
> >  	char *p;
> >  
> > +	if (len > MAX_SKB_FRAGS * PAGE_SIZE)
> 
> unlikely()?
> 
> Also, this seems too aggressive: at this point len includes the header
> and the linear part. The right place for this
> test is probably where we fill in the frags, just before
> while (len)
> 
> The whole can only happen when mergeable buffers
> are disabled, right?

>From what I understand it can happen whenever you're going to build a
skb longer than PAGE_SIZE.

-- 

Sasha.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html