[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201109271037.38786.christoph.paasch@uclouvain.be>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:37:38 +0300
From: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, hkchu@...gle.com,
ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: unalias tcp_skb_cb flags and ip_dsfield
Hi,
I realize that before "struct tcp_skb_cb" is a comment saying that it's 44
bytes long.
However, (as far as I can see) before Eric's change it was 42 bytes long and
now it became 43 bytes.
Wouldn't it make sense to change the comment, so that it's consistent again
with the real size of tcp_skb_cb ?
Cheers,
Christoph
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 wrote David Miller:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:00:49 +0200
>
> > struct tcp_skb_cb contains a "flags" field containing either tcp flags
> > or IP dsfield depending on context (input or output path)
> >
> > Introduce ip_dsfield to make the difference clear and ease maintenance.
> > If later we want to save space, we can union flags/ip_dsfield
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>
> Applied, thanks Eric.
>
> > If there is no objection, I plan to rename "flags" to "tcp_flags" in a
> > following patch.
>
> No objections.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Christoph Paasch
PhD Student
IP Networking Lab --- http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be
MultiPath TCP in the Linux Kernel --- http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be/mptcp
Université Catholique de Louvain
www.rollerbulls.be
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists