netdev - Re: intel 82599 multi-port performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHyNd141gWO_r6bM0T6jYiMMVobBtA7uFzhG51SUivJd0-Orjw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:30:18 +0200
From:	Martin Millnert <millnert@...il.com>
To:	"J.Hwan Kim" <frog1120@...il.com>
Cc:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: intel 82599 multi-port performance

Hi J.Hwan,

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:45 AM, J.Hwan Kim <frog1120@...il.com> wrote:
> I tested the 10G - 64byte frames.
> With ixgbe-modified driver, in single port, 92% of packet received in driver
> level and in 2 port we received around 42% packets.

Are you reading packet drops in the 82599's own registries (ie ethtool)?

Regards,
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html