[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAM7YAnE4w4y6YWWxk0QGOX8Y6AZQHHQBuVMoRuSm=GtALAx=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:16:58 +0800
From: "Yan, Zheng " <yanzheng@...n.com>
To: rongqing.li@...driver.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ipv6: Delete rcu_read_lock
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:46 PM, <rongqing.li@...driver.com> wrote:
> From: Roy.Li <rongqing.li@...driver.com>
>
> Delete rcu_read_lock, it is redundant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roy.Li <rongqing.li@...driver.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/ndisc.c | 3 ---
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> index 9da6e02..dd633ff 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ndisc.c
> @@ -370,17 +370,14 @@ static int ndisc_constructor(struct neighbour *neigh)
> struct neigh_parms *parms;
> int is_multicast = ipv6_addr_is_multicast(addr);
>
> - rcu_read_lock();
> in6_dev = in6_dev_get(dev);
> if (in6_dev == NULL) {
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> parms = in6_dev->nd_parms;
> __neigh_parms_put(neigh->parms);
> neigh->parms = neigh_parms_clone(parms);
> - rcu_read_unlock();
>
> neigh->type = is_multicast ? RTN_MULTICAST : RTN_UNICAST;
> if (!dev->header_ops) {
> --
I think the rcu_read_lock protects in6_dev->nd_parms.
Yan, Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists