[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110929190741.GA10425@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:07:41 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Huajun Li <huajun.li.lee@...il.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about memory leak detector giving false positive report
for net/core/flow.c
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:18:10PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:08:47PM +0100, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >
> > > I tried this but it's tricky. The problem is that the percpu pointer
> > > returned by alloc_percpu() does not directly point to the per-cpu chunks
> > > and kmemleak would report most percpu allocations as leaks. So far the
> > > workaround is to simply mark the alloc_percpu() objects as never leaking
> > > and at least we avoid false positives in other areas. See the patch
> > > below (note that you have to increase the CONFIG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE
> > > as there are many alloc_percpu() calls before kmemleak is fully
> > > initialised):
> >
> > Seems that kernel.org is out and so tejon wont be seeing these.
>
> That's ok, I don't aim this at the upcoming merging window. I don't have
> an alternative email address for him.
That's htejun@...il.com but as long as lkml is cc'd I can read the
emails. Lack of replies is more due to the month long vacation which
just ended. ;)
Thank you.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists