netdev - Re: [PATCH net] mscan: zero accidentally copied register content

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111005155127.GB13794@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:51:27 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc:	Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andre Naujoks <nautsch@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] mscan: zero accidentally copied register content

On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 05:34:00PM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Due to the 16 bit access to mscan registers there's too much data copied to
> the zero initialized CAN frame when having an odd number of bytes to copy.
> This patch clears the data byte read from the invalid register entry.
> 
> Reported-by: Andre Naujoks <nautsch@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
> 
> ---
> 
> Hello Wolf[gang|ram],
> 
> from an error report from Andre Naujoks i tracked down the problem of
> uninitialized data in (normally) initialized CAN frames to the mscan driver.
> 
> Regards,
> Oliver
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mscan.c b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mscan.c
> index 92feac6..1b60fbe 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/mscan/mscan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/mscan/mscan.c
> @@ -327,20 +327,23 @@ static void mscan_get_rx_frame(struct net_device *dev, struct can_frame *frame)
>  	frame->can_dlc = get_can_dlc(in_8(&regs->rx.dlr) & 0xf);
>  
>  	if (!(frame->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG)) {
>  		void __iomem *data = &regs->rx.dsr1_0;
>  		u16 *payload = (u16 *)frame->data;
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < (frame->can_dlc + 1) / 2; i++) {
>  			*payload++ = in_be16(data);
>  			data += 2 + _MSCAN_RESERVED_DSR_SIZE;
>  		}
> +		/* zero accidentally copied register content at odd DLCs */
> +		if (frame->can_dlc & 1)
> +			frame->data[frame->can_dlc] = 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	out_8(&regs->canrflg, MSCAN_RXF);

Nice catch, but wouldn't it be more elegant to never have an invalid byte
in the first place?

if (can_dlc & 1)
	*payload = in_be16() & mask;

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)