[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:06:24 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: danborkmann@...earbox.net
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_packet: tpacket_destruct_skb, deref skb after
BUG_ON assertion
Le lundi 10 octobre 2011 à 10:02 +0200, danborkmann@...earbox.net a
écrit :
> Thanks, you're absolutely right! Here's the trivial patch:
>
> af_packet: removed unnecessary BUG_ON assertion in tpacket_destruct_skb
>
OK but a proper title should be
[PATCH] af_packet: remove unnecessary BUG_ON() in tpacket_destruct_skb
> If skb is NULL, then stack trace is thrown on anyway on dereference.
> Therefore,
> the stack trace triggered by BUG_ON is duplicate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <danborkmann@...glemail.com>
>
missing "---" separator
> diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> index fabb4fa..886ae50 100644
> --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
> +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
> @@ -1170,8 +1170,6 @@ static void tpacket_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> struct packet_sock *po = pkt_sk(skb->sk);
> void *ph;
>
> - BUG_ON(skb == NULL);
> -
> if (likely(po->tx_ring.pg_vec)) {
> ph = skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg;
> BUG_ON(__packet_get_status(po, ph) != TP_STATUS_SENDING);
>
>
Please send a complete new mail without any history.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists