[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111011001505.GB30117@1984>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:15:05 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, joe@...ches.com,
bart.de.schuymer@...dora.be, wensong@...ux-vs.org,
horms@...ge.net.au, ja@....bg, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] netfilter: Remove unnecessary OOM logging
messages
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:13:02PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On 30.08.2011 19:55, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
> > Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:46:34 +0200
> >
> >> On 29.08.2011 23:17, Joe Perches wrote:
> >>> Removing unnecessary messages saves code and text.
> >>>
> >>> Site specific OOM messages are duplications of a generic MM
> >>> out of memory message and aren't really useful, so just
> >>> delete them.
> >>
> >> Looks good to me. Do you want me to apply this patch or are you
> >> intending to have the entire series go through Dave?
> >
> > I'm happy with subsystem folks taking things in if they want, the
> > B.A.T.M.A.N. guys did this earlier today for example.
>
> OK, thanks.
>
> Applied after fixing up some minor rejects in nf_nat_snmp_basic.c,
> thanks Joe.
I have rescued this patch and put into this tree:
http://1984.lsi.us.es/git/?p=net-next/.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/nf-next
At that time (kernel.org problems), we had no public tree and Patrick
temporarily stored in his internal tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists