netdev - RE: [net-next 10/12] igb: move DMA Coalescing feature code into separate function.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:21:34 -0700
From:	"Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
CC:	"Sowles, Jacob R" <jacob.r.sowles@...el.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
	"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next 10/12] igb: move DMA Coalescing feature code into
 separate function.



>-----Original Message-----
>From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org]
>On Behalf Of David Miller
>Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 1:49 PM
>To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T
>Cc: Sowles, Jacob R; netdev@...r.kernel.org; gospo@...hat.com;
>sassmann@...hat.com
>Subject: Re: [net-next 10/12] igb: move DMA Coalescing feature code into
>separate function.
>
>From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:38:26 -0700
>
>> From: Jacob Sowles <jacob.r.sowles@...el.com>
>>
>> DMA Coalescing code needs to be executed during reset, if enabled.
>Moved
>> code to separate function and added a call to it in igb_reset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Sowles <jacob.r.sowles@...el.com>
>> Tested-by:  Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
>
>Something is wrong here, this patch just adds the new function but no
>actual callers.
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Yes, you are correct.  We had a problem in our process and this patch got inadvertently changed during it, removing a substantial part of it, including the call to the new function.  I'm on it and will be submitting a replacement as soon as possible.

Thanks,

Carolyn Wyborny
Linux Development
LAN Access Division
Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html