[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111013100950.GO1830@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:09:50 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ipv4: Fix pmtu propagating
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>
> This dst_check() call will only do something if dst->obsolete is non-zero.
>
> If dst->obsolete can be set in these circumstances, that's a bug. The
> caller is responsible for providing either a freshly looked up route
> or a cached route which has had dst_check() or sk_dst_check() invoked
> upon it.
dst->obsolete was -1 in all cases I observed, regardless if connected or not.
>
> I am pretty sure these rules are followed by the current code.
>
> Again, there are only two scenerios:
>
> 1) 'rt' is just looked up by caller (f.e. udp_sendmsg() in rt == NULL case),
> here dst->obsolete is very unlikely to be non-zero.
>
> 2) Connected case, and we use cached route from the socket, but here
> we'll use sk_dst_check() to validate the route. sk_dst_check()
> makes the necessary dst->ops->check() call if dst->obsolete is
> non-zero, and in fact that is it's one and only job.
>
At least it seems that raw_sendmsg() and ping_sendmsg() don't use
a cached route, they do the route lookup in any case. I don't see
where we check if we learned a new pmtu in this cases.
I added some debugging output and saw that peer->pmtu_learned
has the correct pmtu value, but it never ends up in the metric
of the dst_entry.
With a ping -s 1400 to a destination where the pmtu is 1000
I get for each packet 'Frag needed and DF set (mtu = 1000)'.
That's how I noticed that something changed.
With the dst_check() in ip_setup_cork() I get
'Frag needed and DF set (mtu = 1000)' for the first packet and
all further packets reach the destination, as it was before
commmit 2c8cec5c.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists