netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH] net: allow vlan traffic to be received under bond

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111013153850.GA2031@minipsycho>
Date:	Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:38:51 +0200
From:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To:	Maxime Bizon <mbizon@...ebox.fr>
Cc:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jesse@...ira.com, fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: allow vlan traffic to be received under
 bond

Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 05:04:34PM CEST, mbizon@...ebox.fr wrote:
>
>On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 00:37 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>
>> Hmm, I must look at this again tomorrow but I have strong feeling this
>> will break some some scenario including vlan-bridge-macvlan. 
>
>unless I'm mistaken, today's behaviour:
>
># vconfig add eth0 100
># brctl addbr br0
># brctl addif br0 eth0
>
>=> eth0.100 gets no more packets, br0.100 is to be used
>
>after the patch won't we get the opposite ?

Looks like it. The question is what is the correct behaviour...

>
>-- 
>Maxime
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html