[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111014145431.GF15962@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:54:31 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>
To: "Suresh, Charles" <Charles.Suresh@....com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: __kfree_skb eventually calls kfree_skb violating dropwatch
assumption
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:17:56PM -0500, Suresh, Charles wrote:
> kfree_skb can be called from __kfree_skb through the following call chain :
>
> kfree_skb <- skb_drop_list <- skb_drop_fraglist <- skb_release_data <- skb_release_all <- __kfree_skb (on the 2.38.4 kernel).
>
> This violates the assumption in the dropwatch tool that discarded packets go through the kfree_skb path and all others must go through the consume_skb path (thus resulting in the over-counting of discarded packets in dropwatch).
>
> Neil Horman the author of dropwatch suggested that this could be fixed by skb_drop_list calling consume_skb instead of kfree_skb.
>
> Charles
>
Acutally, looking closer at this, I think we dont' even really need to change
anything, Once acme is done pushing the changes that enable easier user space
symbol matching, I can just modify the dropwatch perf script and user space tool
to filter traces of kfree_skb that occur from skb_drop_list. The only two
places that call is used is from pskb_trim and via a call to kfree_skb or
consume_skb. Neither call should be considered and independent drop event.
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists