[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1318563231.2533.55.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 05:33:51 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] niu: fix skb truesize underestimation
Le jeudi 13 octobre 2011 à 22:26 -0400, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:39:27 +0200
>
> > Add a 'truesize' argument to niu_rx_skb_append(), filled with rcr_size
> > by the caller to properly account frag sizes in skb->truesize
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Please David double check this one as I am not very familiar with NIU
> > code. Thanks !
>
> It looks perfect! And if it's not I'll soon find out :-)
>
Thanks !
By the way, I noticed NIU uses a get_page() every time a chunk is
attached to a skb (only the last chunk of a page is given without the
get_page())
So I thought it might incur false sharing if a previous SKB using a
chunk from same page is processed by another CPU.
But then I see you also do in niu_rbr_add_page(), rigth after the
alloc_page(), the thing I was thinking to add : (perform all needed
get_page() in a single shot)
atomic_add(rp->rbr_blocks_per_page - 1,
&compound_head(page)->_count);
So I am a bit lost here. Arent you doing too many page->_count
increases ?
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists