[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E9898F6.6000302@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:17:58 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
To: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
CC: 'Rick Jones' <rick.jones2@...com>,
"'davem@...emloft.net'" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"'netdev@...r.kernel.org'" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Kravkov <dmitry@...adcom.com>,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bnx2x: Disable LRO on FCoE or iSCSI boot device
On 10/14/2011 9:15 AM, Michael Chan wrote:
> Rick Jones wrote:
>
>> On 10/14/2011 08:53 AM, Michael Chan wrote:
>>> Rick Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is this perhaps saying that a bnx2x-driven device being used for
>>>> FCoE or iSCSI boot must not permit *any* run-time configuration
>>>> change which leads to a NIC reset?
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is right. Unless you have a multipath configuration with
>> multiple
>>> ports, then you can reset one port at a time.
>>
>> So, should there also be a "cnic_boot_device" check in many of the
>> "capital letter" ethtool paths?
>>
>
> If the user is doing ethtool configuration changes or device shutdown,
> it is more obvious what the consequence will be. The user may also be
> careful to do it on a multipath setup.
>
> The reset caused by the auto turn-off of LRO when you enable
> ip_forward or bridging will not be obvious to the user. In addition,
> all devices with LRO turned on will be reset at the same time so even
> multipath will not survive.
>
But after the reset the device should login and SCSI layer should
handle retries. So I don't see why this is a problem. Why do we
need to handle this any different from any other link events?
.John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists