[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E9C5EEE.6060909@uclouvain.be>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:59:26 +0300
From: Christoph Paasch <christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ipv6: inet6_connection_sock.h needs flowi
On 10/17/2011 03:13 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Paasch<christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>
> Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 12:13:39 +0300
>
>> On 10/16/2011 01:41 AM, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Christoph Paasch<christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>
>>> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 12:34:24 +0300
>>>
>>>> Otherwise we have a compiler-warning in c-files not including
>>>> net/flow.h
>>>> before inet6_connection_sock.h .
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Paasch<christoph.paasch@...ouvain.be>
>>>
>>> Example? I've never seen this warning.
>>
>> Currently, all the c-files that include inet6_connection_sock.h
>> indirectly include flow.h before inet6_connection_sock.h. Thus
>> currently there is no compiler-warning.
>
> Then there is no bug you are fixing.
You're right. The patch did not intend to fix a bug (maybe the
commit-message should have been more clear about that).
It was intended to make inet6_connection_sock.h not rely on the c-files
to include flow.h, even if they would not need to. And to do the same
for struct flowi as it is done for the other structs in this
header-file. Thus it was rather a coding-style patch... :)
But ok, maybe I should not try to change something which is not really
broken... ;-)
Christoph
--
Christoph Paasch
PhD Student
IP Networking Lab --- http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be
MultiPath TCP in the Linux Kernel --- http://inl.info.ucl.ac.be/mptcp
Université Catholique de Louvain
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists