[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E9D6416.8070702@st.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:33:42 +0200
From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net-next 8/8] stmmac: limit max_mtu in case of 4KiB and use
__netdev_alloc_skb.
On 10/18/2011 12:18 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 18 octobre 2011 à 12:01 +0200, Giuseppe CAVALLARO a écrit :
>> Problem using big mtu around 4096 bytes is you end allocating (4096
>> +NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info) bytes ->
>> 8192 bytes : order-1 pages
>>
>> It's better to limit the mtu to SKB_MAX_HEAD(NET_SKB_PAD),
>> to have no more than one page per skb.
>>
>> Also the patch changes the netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align() done in
>> init_dma_desc_rings() and uses a variant allowing GFP_KERNEL allocations
>> allowing the driver to load even in case of memory pressure.
>>
>> Reported-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 13 +++++++++----
>> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> index 1848a16..f5ca3be 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> @@ -474,11 +474,13 @@ static void init_dma_desc_rings(struct net_device *dev)
>> for (i = 0; i < rxsize; i++) {
>> struct dma_desc *p = priv->dma_rx + i;
>>
>> - skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(dev, bfsize);
>> + skb = __netdev_alloc_skb(dev, bfsize + NET_IP_ALIGN,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (unlikely(skb == NULL)) {
>> pr_err("%s: Rx init fails; skb is NULL\n", __func__);
>> break;
>> }
>> + skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
>> priv->rx_skbuff[i] = skb;
>> priv->rx_skbuff_dma[i] = dma_map_single(priv->device, skb->data,
>> bfsize, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>> @@ -1176,12 +1178,15 @@ static inline void stmmac_rx_refill(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
>>
>> skb = __skb_dequeue(&priv->rx_recycle);
>> if (skb == NULL)
>> - skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(priv->dev,
>> - bfsize);
>> + skb = __netdev_alloc_skb(priv->dev, bfsize +
>> + NET_IP_ALIGN,
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>>
>
> No, you cant do that in softirq context. We cant sleep here and must use
> GFP_ATOMIC
> Only the init_dma_desc_rings() part is OK, we run in process context and
> are allowed to sleep in memory allocations (GFP_KERNEL)
>
>
>> if (unlikely(skb == NULL))
>> break;
>>
>> + skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
>> +
>> priv->rx_skbuff[entry] = skb;
>> priv->rx_skbuff_dma[entry] =
>> dma_map_single(priv->device, skb->data, bfsize,
>> @@ -1401,7 +1406,7 @@ static int stmmac_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
>> if (priv->plat->enh_desc)
>> max_mtu = JUMBO_LEN;
>> else
>> - max_mtu = BUF_SIZE_4KiB;
>> + max_mtu = SKB_MAX_HEAD(NET_SKB_PAD);
>>
>
> minor nit (since NET_IP_ALIGN is 0 anyway on modern x86)
> max_mtu = SKB_MAX_HEAD(NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN);
>
>
>> if ((new_mtu < 46) || (new_mtu > max_mtu)) {
>> pr_err("%s: invalid MTU, max MTU is: %d\n", dev->name, max_mtu);
>
>
>
Ok! I'm reworking and sending it again.
Thx
Peppe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists