[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFF565DE9F.92BF6FE5-ON6525792D.00488336-6525792D.00494D56@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:52:19 +0530
From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix guest memory leak and panic
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com> wrote on 10/18/2011 04:20:55 PM:
> > > Sigh, only one out of the ten callers of (__)skb_frag_set_page
expects
> > > skb_frag_set_page to take a new reference. I think that's pretty
> > > comprehensive evidence that the current behaviour is unexpected and
> > > wrong.
> >
> > Looks good!
>
> Thanks.
Tested this patch for virtio_net - hang/panic is fixed.
MemFree also doesn't reduce at end of test compared to
the start.
Tested-by: krkumar2@...ibm.com
- KK
> > Does it make sense to commit both of these patches? The
> > reason being - my patch becomes a cleanup of set_skb_frag()
> > in virtio_net driver.
>
> I think your patch remains a valid cleanup but I don't maintain that
> code.
>
> Ian.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists