[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111018.234723.1235424375699917420.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:47:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jesse@...ira.com
Cc: john.r.fastabend@...el.com, hans.schillstrom@...csson.com,
jpirko@...hat.com, mbizon@...ebox.fr, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: allow vlan traffic to be received under
bond
From: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 17:22:02 -0700
> Actually, for most of 2.6.x the behavior was somewhat
> non-deterministic since it depended on kernel version and the NIC. As
> a result, I think we can safely say that this wasn't a particularly
> firm interface that we have to be wedded to. Based on overwhelming
> feedback, I think the interface in this patch is the preferred one and
> what we should stabilize on.
Agreed, and I've applied this patch to net-next, thanks everyone!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists