netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Better namespace handling for /sys/class/net/bonding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m18voh158i.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
Date:	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 06:27:25 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, htejun@...il.com, fubar@...ibm.com,
	andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Better namespace handling for /sys/class/net/bonding_masters

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:47:46 -0700
>
>> Greg, Dave I'm don't know whose tree to merge this through as this code
>> is equally device-core and networking.  I am hoping that we can get this
>> improvement merged for 3.2.
>
> I'm happy to take this series into my net-next tree.
>
> Greg?  Any objections?

on the 13th Greg said:

> These all look fine to me, and I have no problem with them going through
> the network tree as that will most likely be the easiest way due to any
> potential merge issues.
> 
> David, feel free to add an:
> 	Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> 
> to these patches and take them through your tree if that is ok with you.
> If not, I can also always take them through mine, it's your choice.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html