netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: fix wrong port enabling in 802.3ad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111019.035343.1749126014967505732.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:53:43 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	fbl@...hat.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, fubar@...ibm.com, andy@...yhouse.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bonding: fix wrong port enabling in 802.3ad

From: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:21:23 -0300

> The port shouldn't be enabled unless its current MUX
> state is DISTRIBUTING which is correctly handled by
> ad_mux_machine(), otherwise the packet sent can be
> lost because the other end may not be ready.
> 
> The issue happens on every port initialization, but
> as the ports are expected to move quickly to DISTRIBUTING,
> it doesn't cause much problem.  However, it does cause
> constant packet loss if the other peer has the port
> configured to stay in STANDBY (i.e. SYNC set to OFF).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl@...hat.com>

Applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html