[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111020.165703.1713724038045504243.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:57:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: swise@...ngridcomputing.com
Cc: roland@...estorage.com, vipul@...lsio.com,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
divy@...lsio.com, dm@...lsio.com, kumaras@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] RDMA/cxgb4: DB Drop Recovery for RDMA and LLD
queues.
From: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:28:07 -0500
> On 10/20/2011 12:17 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
>>> I believe 5 and 7 have build dependencies.
>> Right, missed that one too.
>>
>> But it seems 4,6,8,9,10 are independent of the rest of the series?
>>
>> ie I can trivially apply them and then worry about working out
>> the drivers/net / drivers/infiniband interdependency a bit later?
>>
>
> Some of these might be dependent on prior patches the series. But if
> they aren't, yes, you could do that.
So, how do you guys want to do this? If you give me a list of which
patches I should put into net-next and leave the rest to the infiniband
tree, that'd work fine for me as long as net-next is left in a working
state independent of the infiniband tree.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists