[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201110201714.36533.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:14:31 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: Kyle Moffett <Kyle.D.Moffett@...ing.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Dietsche <Gregory.Dietsche@....edu>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
Arnaud Patard <arnaud.patard@...-net.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
Thorsten Schubert <tshu@...-ge.com>,
David Decotigny <decot@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/17] phy_driver: Make .read_status()/.config_aneg() optional
On Thursday 20 October 2011 17:10:12 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 20 October 2011 17:00:12 Kyle Moffett wrote:
> > Approximately 90% of the PHY drivers follow the PHY layer docs and
> > simply use &genphy_read_status and &genphy_config_aneg. There would
> > seem to be little point in requiring them all to manually specify those
> > functions.
>
> well, it does make sense if you think about the compile vs build time
> overhead. yes, your patch does make things much nicer to read, and a
> little easier to maintain the source. however, it adds runtime overhead
> (checking the func pointers) while the func pointer storage is unchanged
> (it's now a NULL pointer instead of pointing to the genphy funcs).
> personally, i think the savings in runtime and smaller compiled code is
> more important. so i'm going to NAK this. sorry.
>
> > This patch makes it much easier for subsequent patches to split and
> > refactor the functionality of the .config_aneg() method.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kyle Moffett <Kyle.D.Moffett@...ing.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Documentation/networking/phy.txt | 13 +++++--------
> > drivers/net/phy/bcm63xx.c | 4 ----
>
> hrm, what tree are you using ? this driver is not in mainline.
ah, sorry, i was thinking this was u-boot since we were just having
conversations there.
since this is Linux, and i don't have real standing in the general netdev
community, i can't really NAK here. but i think my comment still stands in
that this patch makes things much worse than the minor code style improvement.
-mike
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists