[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1319197488.3964.15.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:44:48 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: hold sock reference while processing tx
timestamps
On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 12:49 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote:
> The pair of functions,
>
> * skb_clone_tx_timestamp()
> * skb_complete_tx_timestamp()
>
> were designed to allow timestamping in PHY devices. The first
> function, called during the MAC driver's hard_xmit method, identifies
> PTP protocol packets, clones them, and gives them to the PHY device
> driver. The PHY driver may hold onto the packet and deliver it at a
> later time using the second function, which adds the packet to the
> socket's error queue.
>
> As pointed out by Johannes, nothing prevents the socket from
> disappearing while the cloned packet is sitting in the PHY driver
> awaiting a timestamp. This patch fixes the issue by taking a reference
> on the socket for each such packet. In addition, the comments
> regarding the usage of these function are expanded to highlight the
> rule that PHY drivers must use skb_complete_tx_timestamp() to release
> the packet, in order to release the socket reference, too.
It just now occurred to me that technically I think you could use a
destructor function that just points to something like this:
void tstamp_clone_free(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
sock_put(skb->sk);
}
but just forcing drivers to use the right API seems equally good to me.
> These functions first appeared in v2.6.36.
>
> Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Thanks all for the discussions! :-)
Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists