[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZOPZK5vZEgAP3tmeMHamF6jfLpmmOtOu6g_gkY6QGmabL2VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:31:50 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next V2] net: introduce ethernet teaming device
> [...] keep kernel code as slim and clean as possible and do what can be done in userspace
> in userspace. [...] Bonding is carring a lot of baggage, team does not. It's light and it suppose
> to stay that way. Also I would add easy extensibility by writing new mode
> in case any existing is not suitable for your needs. I hope this clears it up for you.
Yes, this clears a lot, so it can be seen as major bonding design/face
lifting done through re-write, such that at the end of the day,
teaming could replace
bonding, makes sense?
Or.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists