[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1319731732.2601.40.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:08:52 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Karel Rericha <karel@...tel.cz>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Quick Fair Queue scheduler maturity and examples
Le jeudi 27 octobre 2011 à 14:46 +0200, Karel Rericha a écrit :
> Actually I am doing some reseach to replace our main shaping machine
> with 60 000+ htb classes, which now saturates 12 core Xeon Westmere to
> 30% (there are five gigabit network ports on each interface affinited
> to cores). AFAIK QFQ should be O(1) complexity so it would bring
> saturation a requirements for number of cores down considerably (HTB
> has O(log(N)) complexity).
>
> I have test machine and about two months to decide if we will stay
> with HTB or we will try something else. So it would be VERY helpful,
> if you would search you memory instead your dead disk :-) and send me
> some example of QFQ usage, if I can ask for a little of your time. I
> promise to have results published here in return.
>
> Thanks, Karel
>
That seems a good challenge to me ;)
First upgrade to a recent kernel with QFQ included.
Also upgrade iproute2 to a recent enough version as well.
Then you discover "tc ... qfq help" is not that helpful :(
# tc qdisc add dev eth3 root qfq help
Usage: ... qfq
OK, its parameters are :
qfq weight num1 [maxpkt BYTES]
You should not touch maxpkt, its default value being 2048
Oh well, I just tried the obvious and my (remote) machine doesnt answer
to me anymore...
Time for a bit of debugging I am afraid :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists