lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111029145900.GA2053@minipsycho.orion>
Date:	Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:59:01 +0200
From:	Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"jesse@...ira.com" <jesse@...ira.com>,
	"hans.schillstrom@...csson.com" <hans.schillstrom@...csson.com>,
	"mbizon@...ebox.fr" <mbizon@...ebox.fr>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"fubar@...ibm.com" <fubar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: allow vlan traffic to be received under
 bond

Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:22:26PM CEST, eric.dumazet@...il.com wrote:
>Le vendredi 28 octobre 2011 à 19:20 -0700, John Fastabend a écrit :
>
>> Thanks Eric! Thought about this some and I haven't come up
>> with anything better yet. Even though this might be a slight
>> hack I would prefer this to reverting the patch.
>> 
>> I'll think about this more tomorrow. Would you be against
>> submitting this patch?
>
>I cant submit this patch, because its a hack and partial fix.
>
>For Unicast packets, we still do the wrong thing : setting their
>pkt_type to PACKET_OTHERHOST before the call to rx_handler :
>
>In this case, bond_handle_frame() wont handle this packet correctly in
>some cases (BOND_MODE_ALB ...). I suppose bridge might be confused as
>well. So other problems remain.
>
>We should delay the PACKET_OTHERHOST setting to the last moment, that is
>the last time vlan_do_receive() is called.
>
>What about following patch instead ?
>
>[PATCH] vlan: allow nested vlan_do_receive()
>
>commit 2425717b27eb (net: allow vlan traffic to be received under bond)
>broke ARP processing on vlan on top of bonding.
>
>       +-------+
>eth0 --| bond0 |---bond0.103
>eth1 --|       |
>       +-------+
>
>52870.115435: skb_gro_reset_offset <-napi_gro_receive
>52870.115435: dev_gro_receive <-napi_gro_receive
>52870.115435: napi_skb_finish <-napi_gro_receive
>52870.115435: netif_receive_skb <-napi_skb_finish
>52870.115435: get_rps_cpu <-netif_receive_skb
>52870.115435: __netif_receive_skb <-netif_receive_skb
>52870.115436: vlan_do_receive <-__netif_receive_skb
>52870.115436: bond_handle_frame <-__netif_receive_skb
>52870.115436: vlan_do_receive <-__netif_receive_skb
>52870.115436: arp_rcv <-__netif_receive_skb
>52870.115436: kfree_skb <-arp_rcv
>
>Packet is dropped in arp_rcv() because its pkt_type was set to
>PACKET_OTHERHOST in the first vlan_do_receive() call, since no eth0.103
>exists.
>
>We really need to change pkt_type only if no more rx_handler is about to
>be called for the packet.
>
>Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
>---
> include/linux/if_vlan.h |    8 +++++---
> net/8021q/vlan_core.c   |    7 +++++--
> net/core/dev.c          |    4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/linux/if_vlan.h b/include/linux/if_vlan.h
>index 44da482..95874ff 100644
>--- a/include/linux/if_vlan.h
>+++ b/include/linux/if_vlan.h
>@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@ extern struct net_device *__vlan_find_dev_deep(struct net_device *real_dev,
> extern struct net_device *vlan_dev_real_dev(const struct net_device *dev);
> extern u16 vlan_dev_vlan_id(const struct net_device *dev);
> 
>-extern bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skb);
>+extern bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skb,
>+			    rx_handler_func_t *rx_handler);
> extern struct sk_buff *vlan_untag(struct sk_buff *skb);
> 
> #else
>@@ -128,9 +129,10 @@ static inline u16 vlan_dev_vlan_id(const struct net_device *dev)
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
>-static inline bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skb)
>+static inline bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skb,
>+				   rx_handler_func_t *rx_handler)
> {
>-	if ((*skb)->vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK)
>+	if (((*skb)->vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK) && !rx_handler)
> 		(*skb)->pkt_type = PACKET_OTHERHOST;
> 	return false;
> }
>diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
>index f1f2f7b..3ec1ada 100644
>--- a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
>+++ b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
>@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
> #include <linux/netpoll.h>
> #include "vlan.h"
> 
>-bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skbp)
>+bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skbp, rx_handler_func_t *rx_handler)
> {
> 	struct sk_buff *skb = *skbp;
> 	u16 vlan_id = skb->vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK;
>@@ -13,7 +13,10 @@ bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skbp)
> 
> 	vlan_dev = vlan_find_dev(skb->dev, vlan_id);
> 	if (!vlan_dev) {
>-		if (vlan_id)
>+		/* Only the last call to vlan_do_receive() should change
>+		 * pkt_type to PACKET_OTHERHOST
>+		 */
>+		if (vlan_id && !rx_handler)
> 			skb->pkt_type = PACKET_OTHERHOST;
> 		return false;
> 	}
>diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>index edcf019..40976b4 100644
>--- a/net/core/dev.c
>+++ b/net/core/dev.c
>@@ -3283,18 +3283,18 @@ another_round:
> ncls:
> #endif
> 
>+	rx_handler = rcu_dereference(skb->dev->rx_handler);
> 	if (vlan_tx_tag_present(skb)) {
> 		if (pt_prev) {
> 			ret = deliver_skb(skb, pt_prev, orig_dev);
> 			pt_prev = NULL;
> 		}
>-		if (vlan_do_receive(&skb))
>+		if (vlan_do_receive(&skb, rx_handler))

I must say I do not like passing rx_handler out like this. Apart it's
not nice, it might be misleading....

How about something like following instead? I must test it but I believe
it should resolve the problem.


diff --git a/include/linux/if_vlan.h b/include/linux/if_vlan.h
index 44da482..165a487 100644
--- a/include/linux/if_vlan.h
+++ b/include/linux/if_vlan.h
@@ -130,8 +130,6 @@ static inline u16 vlan_dev_vlan_id(const struct net_device *dev)
 
 static inline bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skb)
 {
-	if ((*skb)->vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK)
-		(*skb)->pkt_type = PACKET_OTHERHOST;
 	return false;
 }
 
@@ -141,6 +139,14 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *vlan_untag(struct sk_buff *skb)
 }
 #endif
 
+static inline void vlan_handle_leftover(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	u16 vlan_id = skb->vlan_tci & VLAN_VID_MASK;
+
+	if (vlan_id)
+		skb->pkt_type = PACKET_OTHERHOST;
+}
+
 /**
  * vlan_insert_tag - regular VLAN tag inserting
  * @skb: skbuff to tag
diff --git a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
index f1f2f7b..540da12 100644
--- a/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
+++ b/net/8021q/vlan_core.c
@@ -12,11 +12,8 @@ bool vlan_do_receive(struct sk_buff **skbp)
 	struct vlan_pcpu_stats *rx_stats;
 
 	vlan_dev = vlan_find_dev(skb->dev, vlan_id);
-	if (!vlan_dev) {
-		if (vlan_id)
-			skb->pkt_type = PACKET_OTHERHOST;
+	if (!vlan_dev)
 		return false;
-	}
 
 	skb = *skbp = skb_share_check(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (unlikely(!skb))
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index b7ba81a..6fdfcc9 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -3314,6 +3314,14 @@ ncls:
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (vlan_tx_tag_present(skb)) {
+		/*
+		 * Tag is still present here. That means there's no device
+		 * set up for this vlan id. So handle these leftovers here.
+		 */
+		vlan_handle_leftover(skb);
+	}
+
 	/* deliver only exact match when indicated */
 	null_or_dev = deliver_exact ? skb->dev : NULL;
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ