netdev - Re: VLAN Question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EAC20F0.9060508@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:51:12 +0200
From:	Nicolas de Pesloüan 
	<nicolas.2p.debian@...il.com>
To:	Roya Kachooei <rkachooei@...il.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VLAN Question

Le 29/10/2011 15:35, Roya Kachooei a écrit :
> Hi there
>
>
> My question is that is it possible to bond or aggregate two virtual
> interfaces created by VLAN?
>
> In other words is it possible to bond two virtual links for improving
> fail over and load balance?

If both virtual links are supported by the same physical link, nothing will improve.

That being said, some people used VLAN to provide end-to-end links, across one or several common 
switches.

       +-eth0-----vlan-100-----eth0-+
       |                            |
bond0-+                            +-bond0
       |                            |
       +-eth1-----vlan-200-----eth1-+

	Nicolas.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html