[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1320310064.2344.3.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:47:44 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Misha Labjuk <spiked.yar@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: pppol2tp over pppoe NULL pointer dereference
Le jeudi 03 novembre 2011 à 02:35 +0400, Misha Labjuk a écrit :
> Thanks!! Panic disappeared.
>
Here is the official patch submission again (not mangled this time),
thanks !
[PATCH] l2tp: fix race in l2tp_recv_dequeue()
Misha Labjuk reported panics occurring in l2tp_recv_dequeue()
If we release reorder_q.lock, we must not keep a dangling pointer (tmp),
since another thread could manipulate reorder_q.
Instead we must restart the scan at beginning of list.
Reported-by: Misha Labjuk <spiked.yar@...il.com>
Tested-by: Misha Labjuk <spiked.yar@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
---
net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
index 34b2dde..bf8d50c 100644
--- a/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
+++ b/net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c
@@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ static void l2tp_recv_dequeue(struct l2tp_session *session)
* expect to send up next, dequeue it and any other
* in-sequence packets behind it.
*/
+start:
spin_lock_bh(&session->reorder_q.lock);
skb_queue_walk_safe(&session->reorder_q, skb, tmp) {
if (time_after(jiffies, L2TP_SKB_CB(skb)->expires)) {
@@ -433,7 +434,7 @@ static void l2tp_recv_dequeue(struct l2tp_session *session)
*/
spin_unlock_bh(&session->reorder_q.lock);
l2tp_recv_dequeue_skb(session, skb);
- spin_lock_bh(&session->reorder_q.lock);
+ goto start;
}
out:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists