[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111103135851.2229247682ec040d653479e1@freescale.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:58:51 -0500
From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@...escale.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <stable@...nel.org>, <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
<zheng.z.yan@...el.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv4: fix ipsec forward performance regression
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 20:34:30 -0400
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@...escale.com>
> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 18:50:22 -0500
>
> > -stable maintainers, please consider the following two upstream
> > commits for inclusion in upcoming v3.0.x [1] stable releases:
>
> I submit networking stable fixes as needed, so please make such
> requests to me.
>
> I haven't submitted this change yet because I want it to sit a bit
> longer in Linus's tree to make sure there aren't any unwanted
> side-effects.
I see b732339 (ipv4: fix ipsec forward performance regression) has
been added to the 3.0- and 3.1-stable trees.
b732339 increases IPSec fwding performance from 0.2kpps to ~3.5kpps.
However, adding upstream commit aa1c366 (net: Handle different key
sizes between address families in flow cache) brings performance
back up to 2.6.38 levels, i.e., ~44kpps.
So can aa1c366 also be queued to the v2.6.39 and v3.0 stable
trees?
Thanks,
Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists