[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111104172446.GB12913@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 17:24:46 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com,
sassmann@...hat.com, Hamish Coleman <hamish@....apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [net-next 03/10] seeq: Move the SEEQ drivers
Okay, this is the only patch I saw (for the SEEQ drivers), but I notice
that more of the ARM drivers have moved. The result is not nice. Or
even workable.
While looking for my ether1, ether3 and etherh drivers in Kconfig, I
enable every option which is presented to me under the new 'ethernet
drivers' stuff. I'm offered my ether3 driver under the SEEQ stuff -
that's fine. But what about the rest?
Well...
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/Kconfig:
config NET_VENDOR_INTEL
bool "Intel devices"
default y
depends on PCI || PCI_MSI
drivers/net/ethernet/i825xx/Kconfig:
config NET_VENDOR_I825XX
bool "Intel (82586/82593/82596) devices"
default y
depends on NET_VENDOR_INTEL && (ISA || ISA_DMA_API || ARM || \
ARCH_ACORN || MCA || MCA_LEGACY || SNI_RM || SUN3 || \
GSC || BVME6000 || MVME16x || EXPERIMENTAL)
if NET_VENDOR_I825XX
config ARM_ETHER1
tristate "Acorn Ether1 support"
depends on ARM && ARCH_ACORN
This is NOT a PCI driver, yet it has ended up with a requirement for
CONFIG_PCI to be set, which is nonsense for this platform because it
has no PCI.
What about etherh?
drivers/net/ethernet/natsemi/Kconfig:
config NET_VENDOR_NATSEMI
bool "National Semi-conductor devices"
default y
depends on MCA || MAC || MACH_JAZZ || PCI || XTENSA_PLATFORM_XT2000
drivers/net/ethernet/8390/Kconfig:
config NET_VENDOR_8390
bool "National Semi-conductor 8390 devices"
default y
depends on NET_VENDOR_NATSEMI && (AMIGA_PCMCIA || PCI || SUPERH || \
ISA || MCA || EISA || MAC || M32R || MACH_TX49XX || \
MCA_LEGACY || H8300 || ARM || MIPS || ZORRO || PCMCIA || \
EXPERIMENTAL)
if NET_VENDOR_8390
config ARM_ETHERH
tristate "I-cubed EtherH/ANT EtherM support"
depends on ARM && ARCH_ACORN
Again, exactly the same thing.
Thankfully, ARM_AM79C961A is right, so that's two out of five correct.
I've no idea what the right solution is to this complex maze of Kconfig
stuff. Do I through an 'ARM' into the NET_VENDOR_INTEL and
NET_VENDOR_NATSEMI dependencies?
While I realise this is a big change, and bugs like this are likely, it
would've been nice to be copied on more of the patches which affect
drivers I maintain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists