[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB47DB1.2000005@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:05:05 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: what's in a bus_info
On 11/04/2011 04:42 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 16:31 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
>> I guess that wraps back around to the question of whether there is a
>> "standard" for what should be in bus_info. And if it is impractical to
>> get the PCI bus information,
>
> I'm not that familiar with virtio, but would I be right in thinking that
> the virtio 'bus' device is likely to be the child of a PCI device? So
> then you mgiht want to get bus_name() for the grandparent of the net
> device:
> dev_dev = dev->dev.parent->parent;
> (possibly checking for nulls).
I'll take a look.
> If there's some reasonable way to distinguish a 'real' from a virtual
> bus then we could have the generic implementation try to follow parents
> until it finds a bus device. However I think the device model
> maintainers have been gradually moving away from the bus/class
> distinction and so we may not be able to do that.
>
>> whether it is better to return virtioN or
>> ethN. Or perhaps something else entirely.
> [...]
>
> Returning the device name seems entirely unhelpful since the user
> already has that. 'virtioN' is perhaps not much better though.
Agreed, but thought I should ask :)
rick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists