[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB4B1F0.20404@trash.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 04:48:00 +0100
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Michal Soltys <soltys@....info>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 00/11] HFSC patches
On 05.11.2011 03:32, Michal Soltys wrote:
> Those are most of the patches I've been sitting on for a while. For the most
> part they are either small corrections or simplifications (marked with s) - but
> there are also some new things (marked with !), the most interesting being #8
> probably.
>
> All changes are richly commented in respective commit messages. I've been using
> them for a while - so unless I missed some subtlety, all should be fine.
Thanks Michal. It has been quite a while since I've last looked
at this and this is complicated stuff, please give me a few days
to review your patches.
> Apart from these, there's still one subtle thing to do w.r.t. cl_cvtmin (during
> init_vf(), as this value is lagged relatively to the situation at the time of
> enqueue).
>
> On a side note, I was thinking about something like hfsc-strict or so - where
> [uplink] interface could be upperlimited on hfsc qdisc level, but all the class
> upperlimit would be otherwise gone. Not sure if anyone would be even interested
> in something like that at all.
So classes would just use link-sharing curves? That's
already possible, so I probably don't get your idea.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists