netdev - Re: Linux Route Cache performance tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1320605326.6506.27.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Sun, 06 Nov 2011 19:48:46 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Paweł Staszewski <pstaszewski@...are.pl>
Cc:	Linux Network Development list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux Route Cache performance tests

Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011 à 19:28 +0100, Paweł Staszewski a écrit :
> W dniu 2011-11-06 18:29, Eric Dumazet pisze:
> > Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011 à 16:57 +0100, Paweł Staszewski a écrit :
> >> Hello
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I make some networking performance tests for Linux 3.1
> >>
> >> Configuration:
> >>
> >> Linux (pktget) ---->  Linux (router) ---->  Linux (Sink)
> >>
> >> pktgen config:
> >> clone_skb 32
> >> pkt_size 64
> >> delay 0
> >>
> >> pgset "flag IPDST_RND"
> >> pgset "dst_min 10.0.0.0"
> >> pgset "dst_max 10.18.255.255"
> >> pgset "config 1"
> >> pgset "flows 256"
> >> pgset "flowlen 8"
> >>
> >> TX performance for this host:
> >> eth0:            RX: 0.00 P/s      TX: 12346107.73 P/s      TOTAL:
> >> 12346107.73 P/s
> >>
> >> On Linux (router):
> >> grep . /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/*
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_burst:500
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_cost:100
> >> grep: /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/flush: Permission denied
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_elasticity:4
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_interval:60
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval:0
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval_ms:500
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_thresh:2000000
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_timeout:60
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/max_size:8388608
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_adv_mss:256
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_pmtu:552
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/mtu_expires:600
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_load:2
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_number:9
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_silence:2048
> >>
> >> For the first 30secs maybee more router is forwarding ~5Mpps to the
> >> Linux (Sink)
> >> and some stats for this forst 30secs in attached image:
> >>
> >> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/684/test1ih.png/
> >>
> >> Left up - pktgen linux
> >> left down - Linux router (htop)
> >> Right up - Linux router (bwm-ng - showing pps)
> >> Right down - Linux router (lnstat)
> >>
> >>
> >> And all is good - performance 5Mpps until Linux router will reach ~1kk
> >> entries
> >> What You can see on next attached image:
> >>
> >> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/24/test2id.png/
> >>
> >> Forwarding performance drops from 5Mpps to 1,8Mpps
> >> And after 3 - 4 minutes it will stop on 0,7Mpps
> >>
> >>
> >> After flushing the route cache performance increase from 0.7Mpps to 6Mpps
> >> What You can see on next attached image:
> >>
> >> http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/197/test3r.png/
> >>
> >> Is it possible to turn off route cache ? and see what performance will
> >> be without caching
> >>
> > Route cache cannot handle DDOS situation, since it will be filled,
> > unless you have a lot of memory.
> hmm
> but what is DDOS situation for route cache ? new entries per sec ? total 
> amount of entries 1,2kk in my tests ?
> Look sometimes in normal scenario You can hit
> 1245072 route cache entries
> This is normal for BGP configurations.
> 

Then figure out the right tunables for your machine ?

Its not a laptop or average server setup, so you need to allow your
kernel to consume a fair amount of memory for the route cache.

Or accept low performance :(

> The performance of route cache is ok to the point where we reach more 
> than 1245072 entries.
> Router is starting forwarding packets with 5Mpps and ends at about 
> 0.7Mpps when more than 1245072 entries is reached.
> For my scenario
> Random ip generation start at: 10.0.0.0 ends on 10.18.255.255
> this is 1170450 random ip's
> 

I have no problem with 4 millions entries in route cache, with full
performance, not 80%.


You currently have one hash table with 524288 entries
(before you changed /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_thresh)

Its not optimal for your workload, because you have many slots with 4
chained items, performance sucks.

You have to boot your machine with "rhash_entries=2097152", so that
average chain length is less than 1

Your problem is then solved :

# grep . /proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/*
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_burst:5000
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/error_cost:1000
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_elasticity:8
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval:0
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_min_interval_ms:500
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_thresh:2097152
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/gc_timeout:300
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/max_size:33554432
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_adv_mss:256
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/min_pmtu:552
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/mtu_expires:600
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_load:20
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_number:9
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/route/redirect_silence:20480


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html