[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111109153300.GA11617@rere.qmqm.pl>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 16:33:00 +0100
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: add support for per-paged-fragment destructors
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:02:04PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Entities which care about the complete lifecycle of pages which they inject
> into the network stack via an skb paged fragment can choose to set this
> destructor in order to receive a callback when the stack is really finished
> with a page (including all clones, retransmits, pull-ups etc etc).
[...]
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -139,9 +139,16 @@ struct sk_buff;
>
> typedef struct skb_frag_struct skb_frag_t;
>
> +struct skb_frag_destructor {
> + atomic_t ref;
> + int (*destroy)(void *data);
> + void *data;
> +};
> +
> struct skb_frag_struct {
> struct {
> struct page *p;
> + struct skb_frag_destructor *destructor;
> } page;
You can get rid of the data field of skb_frag_destructor: if destroy() gets
pointer to the destroyed struct skb_frag_set_destructor, its users can
get at containing struct via container_of() if needed and the memory
pointed to by data won't have to be managed separately.
Nice work, BTW!
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists