netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: add support for per-paged-fragment destructors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:28:58 +0000
From:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To:	Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: add support for per-paged-fragment destructors

On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 17:24 +0000, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 04:25:14PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 15:33 +0000, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:02:04PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > Entities which care about the complete lifecycle of pages which they inject
> > > > into the network stack via an skb paged fragment can choose to set this
> > > > destructor in order to receive a callback when the stack is really finished
> > > > with a page (including all clones, retransmits, pull-ups etc etc).
> > > [...]
> > > > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> > > > @@ -139,9 +139,16 @@ struct sk_buff;
> > > >  
> > > >  typedef struct skb_frag_struct skb_frag_t;
> > > >  
> > > > +struct skb_frag_destructor {
> > > > +	atomic_t ref;
> > > > +	int (*destroy)(void *data);
> > > > +	void *data;
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > >  struct skb_frag_struct {
> > > >  	struct {
> > > >  		struct page *p;
> > > > +		struct skb_frag_destructor *destructor;
> > > >  	} page;
> > > 
> > > You can get rid of the data field of skb_frag_destructor: if destroy() gets
> > > pointer to the destroyed struct skb_frag_set_destructor, its users can
> > > get at containing struct via container_of() if needed and the memory
> > > pointed to by data won't have to be managed separately.
> > At the moment you can share one destructor between all the frags,
> > whereas data is specific to the frag.
> [...]
> 
> If you want distinct data pointers then you need to also have per-frag
> skb_frag_destructor as you wrote in this patch. So removing 'data' field
> saves memory but doesn't change anything else except the way to reference
> the data (container_of() instead of pointer dereference).

Oh yes, you are absolutely right.

Ian.

> 
> Best Regards,
> Michał Mirosław


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html