[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:56:44 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>,
amit.kucheria@...onical.com, kernel@...gutronix.de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
ben-linux@...ff.org, eric.miao@...aro.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
cjb@...top.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
alan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 01/14] clk: add helper functions clk_prepare_enable
and clk_disable_unprepare
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:27:27AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:15:56AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:05:47PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > {
> > > int ret;
> > >
> > > ret = clk_prepare(clk);
> > > if (ret)
> > > return ret;
> > > ret = clk_enable(clk);
> > > if (ret)
> > > clk_unprepare(clk);
> > > return ret;
> >
> > Yes, looks good.
>
> While this looks like a nice easy solution for converting existing
> drivers, I'd suggest thinking about this a little more...
>
> I would suggest some thought is given to the placement of clk_enable()
> and clk_disable() when adding clk_prepare(), especially if your existing
> clk_enable() function can only be called from non-atomic contexts.
>
> Obviously, the transition path needs to be along these lines:
>
> 1. add clk_prepare() to drivers
> 2. implement clk_prepare() and make clk_enable() callable from non-atomic
> contexts
> 3. move clk_enable() in drivers to places it can be called from non-atomic
> contexts to achieve greater power savings (maybe via the runtime pm)
>
> and where a driver is shared between different sub-architectures which
> have non-atomic clk_enable()s, (3) can only happen when all those sub-
> architectures have been updated to step (2).
The drivers changed here all do clk_prepare/enable in their probe
function. I agree that this clk_prepare_enable patch gives kind of
wrong motivation to just use this function and to forget about
potential power savings with proper integration of clk_prepare/enable.
I think though that it will take a long time until all drivers really
do this no matter if we have such a helper or not. I think that in the
meantime it's better to have a little helper than to clobber the probe
code with additional error handling.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists