[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1321198364.2425.5.camel@sasha>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:32:44 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: penberg@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu,
asias.hejun@...il.com, gorcunov@...il.com,
Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] kvm tools: Implement multiple VQ for virtio-net
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 17:00 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 12:24 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:12:01AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > This is a patch based on Krishna Kumar's patch series which implements
> > > multiple VQ support for virtio-net.
> > >
> > > The patch was tested with ver3 of the patch.
> > >
> > > Cc: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
> > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> > > Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> > > Cc: virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> >
> > Any performance numbers?
>
> I tried finding a box with more than two cores so I could test it on
> something like that as well.
>
> From what I see this patch causes a performance regression on my 2 core
> box.
>
[snip]
After discussing it with Michael, we found out that for a single TCP
flow the guest signals the same TX VQ, but the RX VQ keeps changing -
which means that theres missing host-guest synchronization of hash flow.
--
Sasha.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists